Investigating and analyzing the components of the governmental jurisprudence theories

Omidi Far, Abdolah; Khalafkhani, Ali

doi:10.30497/fiqh.2017.2026

Investigating and analyzing the components of the governmental jurisprudence theories

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

abdolah omidi far ¹

Ali Khalafkhani ²

¹ Faculty member of Qom University and lecturer outside jurisprudence and principles of seminary

² PHD Student Of Fiqh and Islamic Law Foundation at Qom University

10.30497/fiqh.2017.2026

Abstract

Governmental jurisprudence arises from a social need in the field of governance. Opinions about the nature of government jurisprudence, despite its wide extension, have been divided into three main approaches; methodological, thematic and fundamentalist theories. Each of these definitions is about the importance and the nature of government jurisprudence. First theories believe that the governmental jurisprudence refers to systematic developments in the field of jurisprudence and jurisprudence. The second theory with emphasis on the common paradigm advert new topics in the area of Governing. The second theories with emphasis on the common paradigm, basically looking for change in its methodology.
The present research is the result of the study in the scientific works of governmental jurisprudence. In this article, the author attempts to categorize the views of governmental jurisprudence theories and examined and analyzed the components of each one.

Keywords

Governmental Jurisprudence

system making

government

system

Ijtihad

permissible area